The FDA Advisory Committee have now voted in favour of giving children of the ages 5 to 11 the COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use. In the Advisory Committee notes, it has been confirmed that Pfizer have modified the formula of the vaccine to add an ingredient that reduces the acidity of the blood and is commonly used to stabilise people who have suffered a heart attack.
Despite the fact that it is claimed that the vaccine is 90.7% effective for children (5 - 11 year olds), The UK's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation have said that the evidence strongly indicates that almost all children/young people are at a very low risk from COVID-19. So why are they vaccinating all of the children if they don't need it? When symptoms are presented in children, they are “typically mild, and little different from other mild respiratory viral infections which circulate each year”. Children also recover from these infections quickly and according to many studies develop a robust broad spectrum immunity. Children typically have very strong immune systems - so COVID shouldn't be an issue for them.
Remember at the start of the plandemic where our governments had said that the elderly and those with underlying health conditions were at risk from COVID? Now everyone needs to get vaccinated in order to protect us from something along the lines of the common cold.
The rates in 5 to 11 are so low that there were no “cases” of severe COVID-19 or death from either the treatment (n= 1,518) or control group (n= 750), this renders the “90% effective” claim, meaningless. This should have stopped an EUA application in its tracks, as clearly there is no emergency for this age group in particular and therefore no benefit either.
Pfizer admits themselves that the number of participants in their current clinical development program is too small to actually detect potential risks of myocarditis associated with the vaccine. So they claim that the vaccine is perfectly safe yet they don't have enough data to back that claim.
Pfizer have admitted that Myocarditis and Pericarditis have occurred in some people who have had the vaccine. A first dose of Pfizer’s vaccination comes with a risk of 3 to 17 cases of vaccine-induced Myocarditis and a second dose risks an additional 12 to 34 cases of myocarditis.
Yet the vaccination is still safe? According to the US VAERS site there have been 837,593 reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine.
How can a vaccination that causes miscarriages and people to be permanently disabled be safe fore children? How can it be safe for ANYONE?
If Pfizer believes that their vaccination was safe why have they changed the formulation? The authorisation for the EUA being requested is not for the formulation that had been tested in the clinical trials, what has been requested is “a modified formulation of the Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine”.
This is to provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.
Tromethamine (Tris) is a blood acid reducer which is used to stabilize people with heart attacks. Here are known side effects: Respiratory depression – local irritation- tissue inflammation – injection site infection – febrile response – chemical phlebitis – venospasm (vein spasms) – hypervolemia – IV thrombosis – extravasation (with possible necrosis and sloughing of tissues) – transient decreases in blood glucose concentrations – hypoglycemia, and Hepatic Necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters.
The fact that the FDA have authorised the use of the vaccination despite all of the evidence stacked against it shows that they haven't had a thorough look through all of the data. And if they have truly looked through all of the data and STILL came to this conclusion, they're utterly deluded.